About Me

Name: Spin Cipher
Email: spincipher@comcast.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Barak and His Comrades

Barak looked like an old homeboy next to the Little Venezuelan Eggplant.  It was obvious he felt a little exposed tradin’ pleasantries with Chavez and cameras in the room. Do you realize how rare it is to catch two despots smiling in the same frame? That kind of scene usually requires Photoshop, but Barak did it! He did it! We’re talkin’ change, bro, change we can believe in.

Neither despot could hide his giddiness; they connected—big time. When O walked in the room, Little Big Mouth lit up! It was comrades at first sight.  Chavez sees in Obama an up-and-comer he can mentor like Castro mentored him. O's the little brother Chavez never had and Chavez's the big brother O's always wanted.  Welcome to the family, little bro!

Now that O's joined the gang, Venezuela’s Little Commie Who Could and Cuba’s Chewbacca can hardly believe their own press. They recognized O's despotic savantism right away and they’re elated; tickled red. The goal they’ve tried and failed to achieve for decades has just fallen into their laps! The two dictators are punch-drunk about having a despot in the White House. Chavez and Castro exchanged jabs and placed bets on how long it would take O to destroy American free enterprise.  By the looks of things, not very long. Evidentally, O is a quick understudy.

I just can’t wait to see what happens when O and Castro embrace.  Better yet, when O, Castro and Chavez do a group hug. I bet there’ll be “fireworks.”  I’ve always said, “There’s nothing like comrades, Coronas and Havanas together in a pub overlooking El Malecón. Maybe O and his peeps can meet over May Day and enjoy the festivities together. Heck, O should fabricate a diplomatic crisis in Honduras and use it as an excuse to hang with his homies through the US Independence Day holiday. Better yet, maybe he should stay for good. You feelin’ me bro?!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

US Healthcare: An Open Letter to the Democratic Apparatchik

Dear Senators, Congressmen and President,

This is a lengthy letter, but I encourage you (not just staff members) to read it in its entirety. At least 50% of Americans agree with the sentiments expressed herein, so you need to hear what I have to say.

Fortunately for law-abiding citizens, dumb criminals eventually end up in jail. But I am concerned about another more dangerous “super criminal” that is destroying our beloved nation right under our noses! I refer to them as "smart criminals." These high-IQ outlaws don't dabble in petty theft. They always go for the BIG heist. These banditos are some of the smartest desperados ever to brandish—well, a vote, a filibuster or a veto.

Once seated, smart criminals waste no time. With the drive of a crack addict in search of a fix, smart criminals will trample any liberty that gets between them and power. They rush to enact laws that ‘legitimize’ pickpocketing the American people and embezzle their constituents legislatively. No longer is organized crime at war with Government; they are bedfellows!

For the time being, a bunch of these power junkies have managed to gain majorities in the highest political assemblies in this Land as well as the White House. As Americans have observed at an alarming pace since the '08 presidential election, smart criminals and political power make a combustible mixture. To those of us who pay more than lip service to the Founders dream, these faux patriots are using the US Constitution as kindling for their national version of "Bonfire of the Vanities" and our liberties are going up in smoke. Next up for the pyre? The best healthcare system in the world.

The Democratic Socialist Party (DSP) has mastered its mendacious craft. Liberal Democrats mislead the American people continually and some Republican politicians have dissembled with them. The DSP has become a brood of vipers and the “light that is in you is darkness.” The DSP apparatchik uses “Sleight of Pseudonym” to conceal the true nature of their nefarious legislative initiatives. Democratic Socialists give euphemistic names to legislation in order to hustle the American people. In round one of their gang-rape of America, self-titled 'Progressives' slipped the “National Economic Suicide Act” by an unwary electorate by naming it the “American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.” One round wasn't enough to satisfy their lust, so the DSP and a few Republican deserters continue to "*!#$%^" the American people.  For their next major legislative caper, smart criminals only needed to remove the first two words from the "End of Affordable Health Choices Act."  I'd feel less violated by a thief pointing a gun in my face. At least the guy with the gun is honest!

Perhaps you think my line of reasoning is insulting or out of line. You should be grateful that a natural-born American citizen is willing to tell you the truth. There are a lot of naked emperors running around DC these days so consider my letter a friendly tap on the shoulder.

Now that the current brood of smart criminals has set its sights on the US healthcare system, and realizing that DSP members are always in a hurry to get back to "working for the American people," I have limited myself to one simple question.  I’ve even made it multiple-choice.

Which of the following five major Federal social programs enacted since the dawn of the American Republic in 1776 has 1) been so successful that it justifies seizure of an additional 20% of American GDP by today’s Federal Government; 2) stayed within the bounds of it’s enacting legislation, and 3) not far exceeded its original intent beyond anything it’s originators could have imagined? Place a check mark next to each program that matches each of these criteria.
 
   a   Medicare
   b   Medicaid
   c   Social Security
   d   Welfare
   e   Federal Income Tax
   f   None of the above

Historical background information for each program is provided below to facilitate informed responses.

Medicare and Medicaid:   In 1945, President Harry Truman asked Congress for legislation to establish a national health insurance plan. Contentious debate ensued with forward-thinking opponents warning of “socialized medicine.” By the end of his administration, Truman had abandoned his plan for universal health coverage. Fast-forward 20 years and its déjà vu all over again. In an act reminiscent of “Night of the Living Dead,” Truman is reincarnated as Lyndon B. Johnson and on July 30, 1965, signs Truman's exhumed dream into law as Medicare and Medicaid. Before you throw yourself on the back of the hearse headed to Johnson’s “Great Society,” however, you might want to consider the following facts.

In 1966, 19 million people enrolled in Medicare and 4 million in Medicaid with combined federal outlays in 1967 totaling $4.4 billion. Today, the Truman/Johnson dream has morphed into one BIG nightmare and the Federal Government has night terrors that a sleepwalking American public might awaken to the abysmal state of these programs. Today there are 43 million people enrolled in Medicare, 51 million in Medicaid, and combined federal outlays totaling $514 billion or 21% of the Federal budget! Facing the prospect of already below-cost Medicare payments being further reduced, Doctors are reluctant to participate or are fleeing Federal health insurance programs altogether. Can you blame me for wanting the Federal Government to keep its cotton-pickin’ hands off my healthcare?

Social Security:   In 1935, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act into law. The original Social Security tax rate was 1% for both employers and employees—on the first $3,000 earned. Seventy-four years later, the rate has nearly octupled to 7.65% for both employer and employee—on the first $102,000 earned. Social Security is expected to be unsustainable in a dozen years or so and rumor has it the current batch of criminals wants to do away with the cap altogether! I guess higher-paid Americans still aren't paying their ‘fair share.’ Do I have it about right?

Welfare:   America’s poorest of the poor used to receive aid from private individuals and organizations such as churches, and small state-based programs. In 1935, President Franklin Roosevelt signed Aid to Families with Dependant Children (AFDC) into law. This initial “welfare” bill provided $18 per month for one child and $12 for each additional child. Since its birth in 1935, Aid to Families with Dependant Children (AFDC) has come a long way—baby! Says Michael Tanner in The Poverty of Welfare: Helping Others in Civil Society (August 2003),

Welfare may have started with the best of intentions, but it has clearly failed. It has failed to meet its stated goal of reducing poverty. But its real failure is even more disastrous. Welfare has torn apart the social fabric of our society. Everyone is worse off. The taxpayers must foot the bill for programs that don’t work. The poor are dehumanized, seduced into a system from which it is very hard to escape. Teenage girls give birth to children they will never be able to support. The work ethic has eroded. Crime rates soar. Such is the legacy of welfare.

Tanner ought to know what he's talking about. As a Senior Fellow and Policy Scholar at the Cato Institute, Tanner also leads research into a variety of domestic policies with emphasis on health care reform, social welfare policy, and Social Security. I'll take my chances with Tanner. Why don’t you criminals have a chat with Turner before you destroy healthcare.

The Federal Income Tax:   President Abraham Lincoln signed the Revenue Act of 1862 into law to help fund the American Civil War. No problem there. The Act also established a Commissioner of the Revenue and instituted the Federal income tax as a "temporary measure" that would terminate in "the year eighteen hundred and sixty-six.” No problem there either-serious times demand serious action. The Revenue Act taxed incomes above $600 at a rate of 3% and those over $10,000 at 5%. The Act required employers to withhold taxes from pay and send the money to the Commissioner. When the deadline to terminate Federal income taxes rolled around in "the year eighteen hundred and sixty-six,” total tax revenues had climbed to an all-time high of $310 million and a temporary Federal tax system that beneficent to the Federal Government wasn’t about to be terminated. By 2007, total tax revenues as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) had mushroomed to 28.3%. Compared to the amount of taxes Americans paid under temporary Revenue Act of 1862, today’s Americans quantify their taxes in the number of months out of each year they must work before The Godfather is paid off. Would someone who knows the actual meaning of temporary please speak up?!

"Stupid is as stupid does," so says Forrest Gump's Mama. How many times does a country need to be misled by smart criminals before it learns its lesson? Apparently, at least five. This legislation will push America closer to tyranny and finish off the Founders’ dream. Is this the legacy Democrats want to leave to posterity? Please, I implore you; do not do this to America. Do not do this to future generations of Americans.

William Cook

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Smart Criminals

Fortunately for law-abiding citizens, dumb criminals eventually end up in jail. But these are no ordinary criminals. These banditos are the smartest desperados ever to brandish a filibuster. I call them "smart criminals.  Smart outlaws don't dabble in petty theft. They go for the big heist—political power. Once in power, smart criminals can pickpocket the American people legislatively and embezzle their constituents legally by codifying their crimes before they commit them. No longer is “organized crime” at war with Government; they are bedfellows!
 
With the same recklessness that a crack addict goes after a fix, smart criminals will destroy anything that gets between them and power. For the time being, a bunch of these power junkies have managed to gain a majority in the highest political assemblies in the Land. As we have witnessed at an alarming pace since the 2008 presidential election, smart criminals and political power make a combustive mixture. Unfortunately for true patriots, America's smart criminals are using the US Constitution as kindling for their national version of "Bonfire of the Vanities" and our liberties are going up in smoke. Next up for the pyre? The best healthcare system in the world.

Using the same sleight of pseudonym they always use to obscure the true meaning of nefarious legislation, smart criminals name their bills antonymically to hide their true goals. Referred to as the "Give Your Legislation A Name that Jukes Your Opponents and Constituents Strategy," this antonymic device is taken straight out of "The Smart Criminals Handbook."  It greased the skids for the “Bacon Bill" which was called the "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act." For their next major legislative caper, smart criminals only had to remove the first two words from the beginning of the "End of Affordable Health Choices Act." These guys are slick—really slick.  I'd feel less violated by a thief pointing a gun at my forehead.  At least the guy with the gun is forthright!

To those Americans who are clamoring for Federal takeover of the US healthcare system I have a non-trick question—Which Federal social program successes since 1776 give you "warm fuzzies" about turning an additional 20% of US GDP over to the Feds right now?  At the risk of pushing you outside of your comfort zone, might I suggest an objective review of the Government's track record on other major social programs?  If anyone can prove to me that any two among the following five Federal social programs has been successful, I might even begin to get a few warm fuzzies myself. Ready?  Here they are: 1) Social Security, 2) Welfare, 3) Medicare, 4) Medicaid, and 5) the Federal Income Tax.  In fact, prove just one and I’ll declare you the winner.

Social Security: In 1935, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act, the original tax rates were 1% for employers and 1% for employees—on the first $3,000 earned. Since its inception, the Social Security tax rate has nearly octupled to 7.65% for both employer and employee—on the first $102,000 earned. Social Security is expected to be unsustainable in about ten years and rumor has it the Feds want to remove the cap altogether. Well, what do you expect? Someone’s got to secure Social Security before its too late!

Welfare:  The “poorest of the poor” in America used to receive aid from private individuals and organizations such as churches, and small state-based programs. In 1935, President Franklin Roosevelt signed “Aid to Families With Dependant Children (AFDC)” into law. This initial “welfare” bill provided $18 per month for one child and $12 for each additional child. Says Michael Tanner in, the Poverty of Welfare: Helping Others in Civil Society (August 2003),

“… Welfare may have started with the best of intentions, but it has clearly failed. It has failed to meet its stated goal of reducing poverty. But its real failure is even more disastrous. Welfare has torn apart the social fabric of our society. Everyone is worse off. The taxpayers must foot the bill for programs that don’t work. The poor are dehumanized, seduced into a system from which it is very hard to escape. Teenage girls give birth to children they will never be able to support. The work ethic has eroded. Crime rates soar. Such is the legacy of welfare.”

Far be it from me to take anyone's word, but Tanner ought to know what he's talking about. As a Senior Fellow and Policy Scholar at the Cato Institute, Tanner also leads research into a variety of domestic policies with emphasis on health care reform, social welfare policy, and Social Security. I'll take my chances with Tanner rather than those smart criminals.

Medicare and Medicaid:  In 1945, President Harry Truman asked Congress for legislation to establish a national health insurance plan. Contentious debate ensued with forward-thinking opponents warning of “socialized medicine.” By the end of his administration, Truman had abandoned his plan for universal health coverage.  Fast-forward 20 years and in an act that evokes images reminiscent of “Night of the Living Dead,” Truman reappears in the form of President Lyndon B. Johnson and on July 30, 1965, signs Truman's exhumed dream into law as Medicare and Medicaid.  Before you throw yourself on the back of the hearse headed to Johnson’s “Great Society,” however, you might want to consider the facts: In 1966, 19 million people enrolled in Medicare and 4 million in Medicaid with combined federal outlays in 1967 of $4.4 billion. Today, Truman's and Johnson's dream has morphed into One Big Nightmare with 43 million people enrolled in Medicare, 51 million in Medicaid, and combined federal outlays totaling $514 billion, or 21% of the federal budget. Facing the prospect of already below-cost Medicare payments being further reduced, Doctors are reluctant to participate or are abandoning Federal health insurance programs altogether. Can you blame me for wanting to stay with my nightmare scenario?

Federal Income Tax:  President Abraham Lincoln signed the Revenue Act of 1862 into law to help fund the American Civil War. No problem there.  The Act also established a Commissioner of the Revenue and instituted the Federal income tax as a "temporary measure" that would terminate in "the year eighteen hundred and sixty-six.”  No problem there either.  Serious times demand serious action.  I assume dates were spelled out back then.  The Revenue Act taxed income above $600 at a rate of 3% and incomes over $10,000 at 5%.  Employers were required to withhold taxes from pay and send the money to the Commissioner. Tax revenues reached an all-time high in 1866 at $310 million. A temporary Tax Revenue Act that beneficent to the Federal Government wasn’t about to terminate in 1866, or ever.  By 2007, total tax revenues as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) have mushroomed to 28.3%.  Compared to the amount of taxes paid under The Revenue Act that was supposed to end in "the year eighteen hundred and sixty-six," Americans in "the year two-thousand and nine" quantify their taxes in the number of months out of each year they have to work before Uncle Sam is paid off.  Would someone who knows what temporary means please stand up!

"Stupid is as stupid does," or so says Forrest Gump's mom. How many times does a country need to be misled by smart criminals before it learns its lesson? Obviously, more than five.  If we, the American electorate, allow our Government to seize control of our healthcare system, then, in behavior characteristic of the proverbial abused woman, who believing her man’s assurances that “it will never happen again,” goes back for more, we are stupid, and deserve what we get.

© 2009 Squatters Rights Publishing.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Feline Hit Man Headed for the Pound

Michael Vick killed dogs, but Tyler Weinman committed the unthinkable—cat abuse.[1] Investigators have been combing through Weinman’s Internet history and veterinary records of the deceased cats to find out if Weinman’s is just another case of a sadistic adolescent thrill seeker or honor killing by a dog lover over Vick’s crimes against canines. Police also want to know if Weinman acted alone, but the cat’s got Weinman’s tongue.

The teenage kitty killer was released from jail today on $250,000 bond. Weinman will wear an electronic monitoring bracelet and remain under house arrest while he awaits trial on 19 counts of catslaughter. The question that has cat lovers choking on hairballs is “Why, would he stoop to such barbarism when there are humane ways to terminate Tabby?” One bereaved cat owner meowed, “Poor defenseless Tigger,” and fainted. Feline fanatics and police are both worried that there could be copycats.

Cat Coroner Henry Harebawl darted around the crime scene earlier today to assess the carnage. “These cats are in full rigor. I’m finding paws and claws everywhere!” he said. “By the looks of these carcasses, these puddy tats were probably catnapped around midnight and drugged with catnip; toxicology reports will tell us for sure. The toms usually go on the prowl for kitties around midnight. They were probably slain shortly after that; the Cat Examiner’s autopsy reports will pinpoint the times of death.” Harebawl also mentioned that “Cat owners, desperate to save their furniture, are so afraid of furtive feline rescuers that they won't carry kitty into a vet clinic in broad daylight. They end up turning to back alley cat butchers to get rid of their pissing pussycats.”

Callie Calico of Cats Against Cat Abuse (CACA) was on the scene early to make sure investigators didn't overlook anything. "I lost my kitty to a cat abuser," she said." Calico added, "After that traumatic experience, I founded CACA and have given my life to stopping this kind of abuse from happening to other cat lovers. We're working for a cat abuse-free world."

Weinman will be arraigned on July 6 and could get up to 158 human years in prison. That’s about 843 in cat years for the purr sadist. If the prosecutor makes this a hate crime, Weinman's sentence could be longer. The defense is hoping that prosecution will accept the lesser charge of involuntary catslaughter by reason of insanity in exchange for a no contest plea. Lead investigator Bloodhound Bill Bowser (a.k.a. “Snoopy”) dismissed rumors that Weinman could end up in the same prison cell as Michael Vick. “Not on your leash!" Bowser growled. "They’d end up fighting like cats and dogs."

If my satiric take on this story strikes the reader as insensitive or offensive, I've hit my mark. I refuse to raise an eyebrow over the wanton slaughter a few cats in a society that approves the wanton slaughter of 4,000 helpless unborn human beings who are butchered, poisoned, chemically burned, and dismembered in the sanctuary of their mothers' wombs each and every day in this country. Our priorities and indignation are perverse and our damnation is just.

I would only ask that readers be equally indignant over the wanton slaughter every year in America of 1.5 million unborn human beings who are of inestimable value to God who made them, certainly far more valuable than any number of cats. If your contempt for cat abuse exceeds your disdain for child killing, then there is something in you that is as twisted as the neurosis that motivated Tyler Weinman to torture cats.


© 2009 Spin Cipher Publishing.


[1] Actual story can be found on numerous online news websites doing a Google search on “South Florida Cat Killer.”

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Islam Rising in the West - A Prophetic Perspective

Early nineteenth-century Liberalism,1

… stresses the importance of human rationality, individual property rights, natural rights, the protection of civil liberties, constitutional limitations of government, free markets, and individual freedom from restraint as exemplified in the writings of Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, Montesquieu, Voltaire and others … The qualification classical was applied in retrospect to distinguish early nineteenth-century liberalism from the "new liberalism" associated with Thomas Hill Green, Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse, and Franklin D. Roosevelt, which grants a more interventionist role for the state.2

‘Liberal’ and ‘Liberalism’ as they are used today, bear little resemblance to their original meanings.  Today’s Liberalism equates to Statism3 and today’s Liberal is, for all intents and purposes, a Statist. Before they can plunder a society, however, Statists must first "bind the strong man” of truth, for truth is the statist's greatest enemy.  This goal is attained by infecting a society’s time-honored traditional values with pathogenic philosophies such as Multiculturalism, Feminism, Homosexuality, Hedonism, Abortion, and other reprehensible ‘isms.’  For purposes of this article,  I will refer to Statism as a plague—which it is.  The first phase of Statism involves co-opting the host culture’s language, particularly in the area of traditional values, which are a free society's first line of defense against tyranny.  To illustrate, American Statists have hijacked Classical Liberalism’s ‘individual liberty' by shackling it with an “anything goes” meaning that amounts to moral turpitude.4  Thus, Statists have turned America's time-honored value of individual liberty against us in much the same way that an autoimmune disease turns the body's own defenses against itself.

The Apostle Peter spoke of the days we now live in: “While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage.” (2 Peter 2:19) The Psalmist wrote, “But unto the wicked God saith, ‘What hast thou to do to declare my statutes, or that thou shouldest take my covenant in thy mouth? Seeing thou hatest instruction, and casteth my words behind thee.’” (Psalm 50:16-17) Why is this significant?

The West has tossed out God’s Law and a terrifying irony is unfolding as a result—a tyrannical ideology is rushing in to fill the spiritual and moral vacuum in Europe, Canada, and the United States. What is this terrifying irony and what is its prophetic significance?

Muslim populations and thus, Political Islam, are metastasizing indomitably across Europe, Canada and the United States. Muslim birth rates in the west are far outpacing native population birth rates. If these demographic trends continue, the only thing that stands between Eurabia, Canadistan, and Amerabia is time, and not much of it.

The terrifying irony is this: As Political Islam (a redundancy) ascends to prominence, the Law of the one and only God who is love, will gradually be replaced by an intolerant, oppressive, imposed Islamic morality that is at war with everything modern Liberals hold dear.

The neo-Liberal values the West has stubbornly refused to abandon will be forced upon it in the form of Sharia.5 Voluntary adherence will be replaced by forced subjugation to Islamic law which rejects Multiculturalism, Feminism, Homosexuality, Abortion and Hedonism and imposes austere penalties for law-breakers, capital punishment among them. Then the West which chose absolute “freedom” over the perfect “Law of Liberty” (James 2:12) will be given absolute tyranny.

As the scenario above plays out, the West will find itself in the horrible predicament described in the first chapter of Proverbs for those who reject God’s wisdom and counsel:

Because I have called, and ye refused; I have stretched out my hand, and no man regarded; But ye have set at nought all my counsel, and would none of my reproof: I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when your fear cometh; When your fear cometh as desolation, and your destruction cometh as a whirlwind; when distress and anguish cometh upon you. Then shall they call upon me, but I will not answer; they shall seek me early, but they shall not find me: For that they hated knowledge, and did not choose the fear of the LORD: They would none of my counsel: they despised all my reproof. Therefore shall they eat of the fruit of their own way, and be filled with their own devices. (Proverbs 1:24-31)

© 2009 Seeds for Good Soil. For reprint permission, send email to:  spincipher@comcast.net.


1 Also known as Classical, Traditional, Laissez-Faire, and Market Liberalism. (Source:  Wikipedia entry titled Liberalism).
2 Ibid.
3 The Ayn Rand Lexicon describes Statism thus:  “the political expression of altruism [which] is collectivism … [statism] holds that man’s life and work belong to the state—to society, to the group, the gang, the race, the nation—and that the state may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good.” and “A statist system—whether of a communist, fascist, Nazi, socialist or “welfare” type—is based on the … government’s unlimited power, which means: on the rule of brute force. The differences among statist systems are only a matter of time and degree; the principle is the same.”
4 Vile, shameful, or base character; depravity. A vile or depraved act. (Source: dictionary.com)
5 The body of Islamic religious law. (Source: Wikipedia entry titled Sharia)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »