About Me

Name: Spin Cipher
Email: will@goodwillsgate.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

"NUTS!"

Barack Obama's SOTU speech tonight was lifeless and uninspired, his message, contrived. He was out of character and knew it. His impersonation of a recent convert to centrism was unconvincing. The inspiring stories he told fell flat. As he ended his speech and made his way up the aisle to exit the House Chamber, Mr. Obama was noticeably crestfallen; he knew he had failed to connect with his immediate audience and the American people. Mr. Obama is only now beginning to realize what many of the American people have known since he took office; he has no clothes on; his credibility is shot.

It is unthinkable to me that Republicans would sit side-by-side with Democrats who have set themselves against the Constitution and the American people. I am angered by expressions of collegiality toward those who would destroy our Constitutional Republic and way of life. The actions of Barack Obama, Harry "The Body" Reid, Stretch Pelosi and their cabal have been nothing short of treasonous. When Republicans sidle up to Democrats, they side with the enemies of our future!

How can we believe a man who has spent $1-million in legal fees to keep his birth certificate from the American people? How can we trust a leader who has consistently misrepresented himself, his past, his political philosophy, his associations, his true agenda, and propagandized the American people since before he took office?

For the past two years, the majority party in Washington has been demolishing America. Why would we want Republicans to get along with them? I want them vanquished from Washington! They have proved themselves unfit for any office. How dare Republicans "reach across the aisle" to Marxist ideologues! We should feel safer shoving our arms into an adder's den! Was the message "we the people" sent to Washington on November 3, 2010 "Why can't we all just get along?" To Republicans who are just paying lip-service to conservative ideals, we've got a message for you: Keep it up and you'll discover that you are just as naked as the emporer.

We are fighting America’s Bataille des Ardennes and Republicans allow Democrats to cow them into date night during a SOTU speech?! What if General Anthony McAuliffe had agreed to a date with the Nazi commander who demanded his unconditional surrender at Ardennes? McAuliffe said "NUTS" to the Nazis and we say "NUTS" to Barack Obama's call for our surrender!

Spin Cipher
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Coming to Washington - We the People

To progressives and RINOs on Tuesday, November 2, 2010:

We the People are coming to Washington. When the new Congress is seated in January 2011 we will take our seats as well.
 
You would be wise to disabuse yourselves now of the notion that a two-year stalemate in Washington will work to your advantage in 2012. Tuesday’s election will be a repudiation of your unpatriotic, un-American agenda, the agenda that Barack Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi et al have been ramming down our throats since Barack Obama usurped the Oval Office by portraying himself as a 'moderate.' It will be an affirmation of our love for America and a rebuke of your hatred for this blessed land. Lest Grand Old Party Judases think they will ride on conservatives' coattails, it will be a rejection of your compromises and glad-handing "across the aisle."
 
You are banking on electoral amnesia in 2012 in hopes of running against a “Do Nothing” Republican Congress as Harry Truman did in 1948. It won’t work this time boys and girls. We’re on to you. Don’t even think about it! You took the mask off in January 2009 and we’ve been staring into the ugly face of progressivism for two full years. Yours is not a face easily forgotten.
 
This election, We the People will be sending ourselves to Washington. We aren’t coming to "reach across the aisle" to you, impede your progress or erect ramparts to slow your advance. There will be no ceasefire, truce or DMZ. We are coming to rout you! We will demand your unconditional surrender and the return of our government to us. Yes, we are coming ?Did you hear that progressives and RINOs? ?We the People are coming for you!
 
Your incremental attack on the U.S. Constitution is a declaration of war on We the People as ignominious as the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor or Islamists’ attack on the World Trade Center on 9/11.  Bad move.  We weren't looking for a fight when you attacked our liberty; if it’s a fight you want, it’s a fight you’ll get. We are the patriots in this contest and our cause is worth fighting and dying for as the graves at Arlington attest. We will end your war on America and demolish your fiendish agenda. You will be defeated and we will give you no quarter.
 
The last two years have left us weary, but we’ve no intention of quitting or slowing down. We’re coming. Oh yes, we are coming. You like to call us “extremists.” Well, we are about to show you what "extreme" really means?We will demand that Senators and Congressmen who abetted the mortgage loan crisis be subpoenaed to testify under oath. We will demand that politicians who broke trust with the Constitution be held accountable. We will demand that politicians who took bribes for political favors be censored and if warranted, prosecuted. We will demand that Barack Obama show us his birth and education records; if he is a fraud, we will demand his removal from office and prosecution of every politician and election official who aided and abetted his election.
 
You may not know it yet, Harry, Nancy, Christopher, Barney, Steny, and the rest of you punks, but the jig is up.  It’s over. You’re done. Finished.  Kaput. Tuesday’s resounding victory for America will be the end of our beginning and the beginning of your end. Unlike Nancy Pelosi, We the People are not bluffing when we say we're coming to "empty the swamp."
 
We the People
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We Dare Not Despise this Holy Trust

Today, October 30, 2010, is the 275th birthday of Founder and 2nd U.S. President, John Adams.   Almost one year to the day before he added his signature to the Declaration of Independence, on July 7, 1775, John Adams penned these sobering words in a three-page letter to his beloved Abigail:

“Your Description of the Distresses of the worthy Inhabitants of Boston, and the other Sea Port Towns, is enough to melt an Heart of stone. Our Consolation must be this, my dear, that Cities may be rebuilt, and a People reduced to Poverty, may acquire fresh Property: But a Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored. Liberty once lost is lost forever. When the People once surrender their share in the Legislature, and their Right of defending the Limitations upon the Government, and of resisting every Encroachment upon them, they can never regain it.” [italics mine]

Our right to vote as American citizens is a gift bestowed by Almighty God; but it is more than a right or a privilege.  Jesus said, “For unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more.” (Luke 12:48)  The right to vote is a holy trust given each of us by a righteous God who will hold us accountable for our stewardship of that right.  As an ordained minister and former pastor of five years myself, I am confident that clergy who neglect their duty to teach their flocks proper stewardship of the right and duty to vote will suffer stricter judgment.

Most of us could not tell how many times we have uttered Jesus’ words in “the Lord’s Prayer,” “Thy kingdom come; Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven.”  And yet for some of us, our voting habits undermine the the answer to that prayer.  We demean our vote when we vote for candidates who favor unrighteous causes such as abortion or same sex unions.  We must not treat voting as an optional, inconsequential, or unnecessary exercise or God will withdraw the privilege.

The Book of Proverbs tells us that “Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people.” (Proverbs 14:34) With so much, indeed, our liberty at stake in Tuesday’s election, it is unthinkable that any able-bodied Christian would not vote, much less vote for unprincipled
candidates or candidates who support expansion of government’s role in our personal lives.  If we exalt ungodly men by our vote, it is a reproach to Christ and debases His Church.

Charles G. Finney, a prominent Second Great Awakening preacher, said the following about a Christian’s vote,

“[T]he time has come that Christians must vote for honest men and take consistent ground in politics or the Lord will curse them ... Christians have been exceedingly guilty in this matter.  But the time has come when they must act differently ... Christians seem to act as if they thought God did not see what they do in politics. But I tell you He does see it - and He will bless or curse this nation according to the course they [Christians] take [in politics].”

WallBuilders' website (http://www.wallbuilders.com) succinctly spells out guiding principles for the Christian voter, indeed, for any patriotic American citizen who is committed to the Founders’ ideals as enumerated in America’s Founding Documents.  Please watch the “Voter Responsibilities” video linked therein and if you are a pastor, please show the video in your church service tomorrow.

Will our vote on Tuesday count for righteousness and guarantee our right to choose our future leaders, or will it be the our last that really counts?  America hangs in the balance and this vote will be a referendum on the Church and its leaders.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

This Game is Over!

Since so few of our Republican representatives in Congress or the Senate seem willing to state the obvious, I will. The greatest threat America faces today isn’t terrorism. Russia’s arsenal of nuclear weapons or a nuclear armed Iran isn’t as likely to incinerate American civilization. The greatest threat Americans face today resides in the White House, Congress and the United States Senate. Barack Obama and progressives in Congress and the Senate are at war with America and those of us who subscribe to limited Constitutional Government are the enemy.

Barack Obama may have one or two good qualities, but loyalty to the United States Constitution is not among them. Every speech Mr. Obama delivers and every piece of legislation or Executive Order he signs is an act of war against American Liberty.  Barack Obama and the progressive cabal supporting him behind the scenes are leading Constitution-loving Americans on a Bataan Death March as they work around the clock to transform this nation into a Latin American-style Marxist dictatorship. No, Mr. Obama isn’t sending troops into US cities to silence opposition or execute dissidents; at least not yet.  But make no mistake; if Barack Obama thought he could have gotten away with it he would have usurped our health care system by edict and he would dispatch troops against Patriotic Americans if he thought it necessary.

Admittedly, Barack Obama’s winsome persona and all the talk of “hope and change” make it seem preposterous that he would be anything worse than an inept leader.  But if readers will suspend their emotional feelings about Barack Obama, both what they want to believe about him and what they just can’t believe about him, long enough to consider the objective facts of what he has done that he said he’d never do, and what he hasn’t done that he swore he would, one can only conclude that Mr. Obama will say whatever is necessary to buy more time until patriotic Americans have run out of time to stop his“fundamental transformation of the United States of America.” As John Adams so aptly argued for the Defense in the Boston Massacre Trials in December 1770, “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.”  Referring to the things Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and the rest of the progressive elites have been doing to America as anything other than aggression won’t alter the facts.

Finally, I will repeat what I have said many times since Barack Obama entered the White House. The evidence suggesting that Barack Obama is not a natural-born US citizen is unarguably more compelling than any verification he has produced to date. Citizenship is his Achilles heel. If Republicans want to slow this Marxist demagogue down, there has been and remains one, possibly two ways do it. Attack his specious citizenship loudly and often and introduce articles of impeachment against him, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi in the House of Representatives for egregious offenses against the US Constitution.

This is no time for atrophying testicles. If Republicans continue to insist on playing the “my friend across the aisle” game, America will be lost. Your “friends across the aisle” can dress up like Congressmen and Senators, but they do not represent anything I hold dear and they are definitely not my friends or my friends’ friends. They are my enemies and enemies of the Constitution.

This game is over. If the only thing Republicans intend to do is hold out until November 2010, it will be too late to act. Don’t talk, ACT!   Do anything but just talk. Have the guts take serious action. The next time Joe Wilson yells “You lie!” during a State of the Union address, don’t pressure him to back down or apologize.  He spoke for me that night. If a naked Rahm Emanuel pokes his finger in your chest in the House showers, kick him where it counts or send him a dead fish. If you don’t have the spine to take that kind of action, you don’t understand what is happening to America or you do not have what it takes to turn this around. Hell, elect me! I don’t care if those bastards offer me the world or twist my arm until it comes out of its socket. I know what is right and I don’t have a price.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Founders on Christianity

Why is it that I have to go back more than 230 years to find someone who is right on the role of Christianity in America's founding and preservation?

It cannot be emphasized too strongly or too often that this great nation was founded, not by religionists, but by Christians; not on religions, but on the Gospel of Jesus Christ. (Patrick Henry)

It is impossible to rightly govern the world without God and the Bible. (George Washington)

We recognize no sovereign but God, and no King but Jesus! (John Hancock)

When the Founders spoke of "religion" affirmatively, they did not have today's catch-all, multicultural meaning in mind. Most of the Founders were men of Holy Scripture and as such, they understood what true religion was and wasn't. James had defined it in his epistle to the Church:

"Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world." (James 1:27)

Even if every American should reject the notion that America was and is a Christian nation, it would still be, making her citizens failed stewards of that which belongs to God who has promised to give it to the meek one day, the meek who are getting ready.

For instance, the Founders never would have countenanced large numbers of Muslims emigrating to America considering that less than 100 years before the signing of the Declaration of Independence, the rapacious Moors, who left carnage and destruction in their wake, were finally stopped at the Gates of Vienna as they were about to overrun Christian Europe. Indeed, America's fourth President, John Quincy Adams had this to say about Islam and its progenitor:

"In the seventh century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab of the lineage of Hagar, the Egyptian, combining the powers of transcendent genius, with the preternatural energy of a fanatic, and the fraudulent spirit of an impostor, proclaimed himself as a messenger from Heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth. Adopting from the sublime conception of the Mosaic Law, the doctrine of one omnipotent god; he connected indissolubly with it, the audacious falsehood, that he was himself his prophet and apostle. Adopting from the new Revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life, and of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust by adapting all the rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. The essence of his doctrine was violence and lust: to exalt the brutal over the spiritual part of human nature ... Between these two religions, thus contrasted in their characters, a war of twelve hundred years has already raged. The war is yet flagrant ...While the merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish motives to human action, there can never be peace upon the earth, and good will towards men."

John Quincy Adams

(From "Unsigned essays dealing with the Russo-Turkish War, and on Greece,” written while Adams was in retirement, before his election to Congress in 1830; originally published in The American Annual Register.)
Does this offend you?  It is time to stop apologizing for truth!  I prefer friendship with the truth to placating misguided critics.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

America's Most Credible News Source

It must be said, that like the breaking of a great dam, the American decent into Marxism is happening with breathtaking speed, against the backdrop of a passive, hapless … people.
Liberals hardly notice when Rush Limbaugh makes a statement like that; its all in the Conservative talk radio noise. But when Russian journalist Stanislav Mishin makes it, every American ought to tune in and listen as intently as they would if E. F. Hutton opened his mouth. The quote is the opening sentence in Mishin’s article, American Capitalism Gone with a Whimper, which appeared in the April 27, 2009 edition of PRAVDA On-Line1, a Web-based reincarnation of the former official organ of the Soviet Union’s Central Committee, Pravda, which Russian Federation President Boris Yeltzin ordered shut down in 1991.2
 
Mishin derides America’s capitalist arrogance and inability to arrest Marxism’s influence. His article evinces sarcastic admiration for the speed with which upstart Marxist rookie, Barak Obama, and his comrades are showing up Russia’s Bolsheviks, who “wrote the book” on social revolution. In particular, Mishin cites profligate Government deficit spending and private industry takeovers by the Obama Administration as examples of their bold and aggressive style. 
The final collapse has come with the election of Barack Obama. His speed in the past three months has been truly impressive. His spending and money printing has been a record setting, not just in America's short history but in the world. If this keeps up for more than another year, and there is no sign that it will not, America at best will resemble the Wiemar Republic and at worst Zimbabwe.
Mishin continues, citing various social strategies statists have implemented to weaken American resolve against totalitarianism: 
… the situation has been well prepared on and off for the past century, especially the past twenty years … Those lessons were taken and used to properly prepare the American populace for the surrender of their freedoms and souls, to the whims of their elites and betters … First, the population was dumbed down through a politicized and substandard education system based on pop culture … Then their faith in God was destroyed, until their churches, all tens of thousands of different "branches and denominations" were for the most part little more than Sunday circuses …
Mishin concludes by exhorting fellow Russians who own businesses and industries in America to “look thoughtfully at this and the option of closing their facilities down and fleeing the land of the Red as fast as possible. In other words, divest while there is still value left.”
 
One of the things I take away from reading Mishin’s article, and it is telling, is this: When the Russian media become a more accurate and reliable source of information about goings-on in America than the American media, it is time to stop indulging America’s mainstream media by absorbing their spin on the “news.” Otherwise, the results can be disastrous—well-meaning Americans who would otherwise oppose the statists’ pernicious revolution, were they accurately informed, end up being its willing accomplices.
 
I would encourage everyone who reads this to go to Pravda On-Line and read Mishin’s article. If you happen to be one of the American mainstream media’s hapless victims, it is time to de-neutralize yourself and engage, as Mishin exhorts Russian business owners, “as fast as possible” and “while there is still value left” in the American dream.
 
© 2009 Unspun Publications.
 
1 PRAVDA On-Line is an Internet-based newspaper run by former Pravda newspaper employees and is unrelated to Pravda. (Source: http://www.wikipedia.org)
2 Pravda (Russian: "Truth") was a leading newspaper of the Soviet Union and an official organ of the Central Committee of the Communist Party between 1912 and 1991. The Pravda newspaper was started in 1912 in St. Petersburg. It was converted from a weekly Zvezda. It did not arrive in Moscow until 1918. During the Cold War, Pravda was well known in the West for its pronouncements as the official voice of Soviet Communism. (Similarly Investia was the official voice of the Soviet government.) After the paper was closed down in 1991 by decree of President Yeltsin, many of the staff founded a new print newspaper with the same name, which is now a tabloid-style Russian news source. (Source: http://www.wikipedia.org)
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

$1,000,000 Birth Certificate

People who know me will confirm that my fiscal track record is unlikely to garner an appearance on The Dave Ramsey Show. If a problem has two possible solutions, one costing $10 and the other $1,000,000, however, even I have enough fiduciary stock to be invested with that choice. I would not fail.
 
Barak Obama has a birth certificate problem. I know about the $10 solution because I read about it myself on Hawaii’s Department of Health (DOH) website. All Barak needs to do to get a certified copy of his birth certificate is go to the Hawaii Vital Records web page with a credit card, and for about the cost of three packs of smokes, they’ll ship it straight to the Oval Office. Strangely, Barak's approach involves paying high-powered attorneys about $1-million to make sure his birth certificate doesn't ever see the light of day. I don't know what the big deal is about $10 but maybe he wants to economically stimulate the attorneys. Or, maybe he's intimidated by the Internet. All I know is, the Obama team defined “tech-savvy" during the campaign, so I’m sure they’ll figure it out soon enough.
 
Lots of Americans believe Barak Obama’s a genius, a “miracle worker,” practically “divine.” Why Louie Farrahkahn even says he’s “the messiah.” He’s so smart, in fact, that he is healing the U.S. economy, right before our very eyes and for the first time in recorded history, by profligately taxing and spending it back from the brink of eternal destruction to the mount of economic transfiguration. They say he’s gonna do it with Cap and Trade (whatever that is) and Health Care Reform too. Every other country that has tried has failed, but they didn’t have “the messiah.”
 
I may not be an economic Einstein, but I'd spend the ten bucks and have certified copies of my birth certificate mailed to every plaintiff who has filed suit in a U.S. court alleging that I’m ineligible to be President because I’ve never produced it. I’d have never have guessed that spending a million dollars on attorneys to keep my birth record private is a better idea than the ten dollar option, but I guess that’s why Barak Obama is in the White House and I’m still paying rent.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Letter to Chief Justice Roberts re Barak Obama's Citizenship

After I typed this letter to Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, I learned of the case of US Army Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook who is balking at orders to deploy to Afghanistan because he does not believe Barak Obama is a natural-born US citizen and thus is ineligible to serve as President and Commander in Chief.  Cook’s attorney, Orly Taitz, has filed court papers requesting a temporary restraining order citing her client’s conscientious objection. Why would any US soldier be required to obey the command of a foreign national or someone who has never proven his status as a natural-born US citizen and thus his eligibility to be President and command US troops? As I have said many times before, this is not going away.


July 14, 2009

Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543


Dear Chief Justice Roberts,

The New Testament epistle to the Hebrews states that there is no place to hide from the penetrating scrutiny of God’s holy gaze, but that “all things are naked and opened unto the eyes of him with whom we have to do.” (Hebrews 4:13)  In the book of Numbers it is written, “Be sure your sins will find you out!” (Numbers 32:23)  The truth always comes out.

Two months ago, I sent a letter to you asking you and your colleagues to schedule a full hearing on the matter of Barak Obama’s eligibility to serve as President of the United States based on his apparent refusal to produce a certified copy of his birth certificate.  There is mounting evidence suggesting that Mr. Øbama is not a natural-born US citizen, perhaps not a US citizen at all.

The burden of proof of citizenship rests with the candidate and his nominating party, does it not? The fact that Barak Obama has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars in lawyer fees to block dozens of legitimate attempts to gain access to his birth and education records, is itself prima facie evidence that he is hiding something. With respect to his birth record, what could he possibly be hiding but his place of birth?  Does a spurious PDF image of a “Certification of Live Birth” posted on a website serve as evidence enough for the Supreme Court to look the other way on this critical Constitutional issue?

If by some other means it comes to light that Barak Obama is not a natural-born US citizen, what will it do to Americans’ confidence in the Presidency, let alone in the highest court in this land? What will it mean if Barak Obama is indeed a Kenyan citizen as attested by his Kenyan grandmother who claims to have been present in the hospital delivery room when he was born in Nairobi? How will US military commanders respond to a “Commander in Chief” who isn’t constitutionally eligible to be President, let alone command US troops into battle? What kind of precedent will this set should future foreign-born individuals decide they want to run for office?

Are American citizens obliged to obey the Executive Orders of a man whose eligibility to be President is dubious? Are American citizens obliged to obey American National Guard troops who are commanded by a foreign national?  Can a majority of American citizens legitimately elect as President a man who isn’t constitutionally eligible? Can a majority of Americans override the Constitution by electing someone who is ineligible?

I realize that the truth might mean chaos for a time; in all likelihood, rioting, violence and even death might ensue. However, as the economy continues to deteriorate and more Americans are unemployed, or if some other civil or natural crisis occurs, will this issue not add to the civil uncertainty as a result of Americans’ loss of confidence in the White House? You see, Justice Roberts how avoidance merely delays the inevitable. Mark my words. The US Legislature and the courts will not be able to sweep this under the rug.  If you do not deal with this issue now, the day will come when you will curse the day you decided to ignore it.

Hundreds of thousands of Americans have died defending our freedoms since the Founding. I’d rather see American cities burn and be done with it than stand idly by while American liberty is slowly incinerated by a foreign-born national!  You do realize that if Obama is not a US citizen that Americans are under foreign occupation?

This doesn’t have to be a fait accompli. My appeal is not based on the false notion that Justices are “elected representatives.” I understand the Court is not a legislature. I am not an attorney—obviously—But I am well-educated, intelligent and most important of all, I have common sense. As an American, in the name of the Constitution of the United States which you swore to uphold, in the name of Almighty God who will judge the living and the dead, and on behalf of every American who has a right to know if Barak Øbama’s is a natural-born US citizen, I appeal to you to deal squarely with this issue. I have a right to make this appeal to you; I do not need to be an attorney to do so, any more than a Supreme Court justice is required to have law degree to be on the Supreme Court.

Please—Act before it is too late.  Act before America is lost forever.

Respectfully,
 
WHC
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dreams of My American Father on America's 233rd Birthday

Barak Obama's treasonous attempt to vacate the US Constitution by occupying the Office of President of the United States as a foreign-born national

I, William Jr., am the first-born son of my deceased father, William Sr.  My father was a member of the Greatest Generation and a patriotic American.  On December 8, 1944, one day after the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, he enlisted in the US Army Air Force. On July 21, 1944, on a bombing mission deep into Southern Germany, his B-24 Liberator, the “Lucky Buck,” took shrapnel and began to rapidly lose altitude. The crew bailed out and my father was captured by German troops. He was forced to march across Germany to a POW camp, Stalag Luft #3, where he remained a prisoner until VE Day, May 8, 1945. At 6-foot, 2-inches tall, my father weighed less than 100 pounds by the time his German captors released him into the hands of British forces. My brave father fought to defeat the same kind of tyranny America is facing today in IslamofacismHe risked his life to ensure that his and future generations of Americans would enjoy life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. He volunteered because he believed in America’s greatness. These were The Dreams of My American Father and I am proud to claim them as my own.

I am a natural-born citizen of the United States. I have been a proud Virginian my entire life. My wife and I have raised five beautiful children in the Commonwealth. We have taught our three sons and two daughters that America is a land of liberty, justice, and equal opportunity for all. We taught them to love America as the Framers intended it, and to love the God who gave us this once-in-a-millennium, one-of-a-kind “Land of the Free and Home of the Brave.” As an ordained minister, I recently enjoyed the honor of presiding over oldest daughter’s wedding in Haymarket, Virginia. I have four siblings, five nieces and six nephews who also reside in Northern Virginia.

In two days, America will celebrate its 233rd birthday. Today, words are not sufficient to describe the grave concern I have over the direction our nation is being taken in. We are losing America! Our children and grandchildren are losing America.  A world in desperate need of freedom is losing Liberty’s Guardian, America. Or should I say America is being stolen from us!

Article II, Section 1 of the United States Constitution states,
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.”  Therefore, it would seem incumbent on political parties to obtain certifiable documentary evidence of a candidate’s eligibility to occupy the Oval Office before nominating them, and to make that evidence readily available, not only to state governors, legislatures, election certification authorities, and legal inquisitors, but to any American citizen who asks for it. Since the burden of proof of eligibility lies with the candidate and his nominating party, it must be assumed that any Presidential aspirant who resists or is unable to provide such evidence, is ineligible to be President.

I am not an attorney or legal scholar, but simple common sense instructs me that a PDF image of a, some say, forged Hawaiian “Certification of Live Birth” (which is not a Hawaiian birth certificate) posted on a partisan political website doth not evidence beyond a reasonable doubt make. Were we voting for homecoming queen or the next HOA president instead of the President of the United States, certification of natural-born citizenship might not weigh as heavily in the vetting process. In matters as weighty as who will command US forces into battle, however, any corner-cutting by those responsible for fully vetting a candidate’s eligibility to hold office, is inexcusable and a treasonous dereliction of dutyOne who knowingly holds the Office of President in violation of the US Constitution should be impeached and tried for high treason. Anyone who aids and abets someone who is not constitutionally eligible to hold the office, commits treason and should be tried as a traitor.

The fact that Barak Obama has retained elite legal counsel and paid them hundreds of thousands of dollars to block any legitimate attempt to gain access to his certified birth record, when it would be much easer and cost only $500 to obtain and distribute fifty copies to inquisitors, is itself compelling prima facie evidence that demands a rebuttal, or delivery of the goods.  In the absence of these, it must be assumed that Barak Obama is ineligible to be President and that his removal from the White House, by force if necessary, is mandated.

How much more evidence do we need? Why are our elected representatives standing idly by while this fraud, who has not provided a single shred of certifiable evidence that  he is a natural-born US citizen, whose birth in Kenya has been attested to by family eyewitnesses, whose childhood enrolment in an Indonesian Madrasah suggests he would have had to renounce citizenship in any other country and become an Indonesian citizen, shreds the US Constitution?  It is time to remove this evil impostor from the White House or America is finished.

To Our Elected Representatives

How much longer do our elected representatives think the American people will stand for this masquerade?!  More than 50% of Americans are now aware of the questions surrounding Barak Obama’s eligibility and almost 50% are troubled by it or believe Obama should release all relevant documents, including his birth certificate.  Do our representatives and judges who are kicking the can down the road actually believe that allowing this sham of a Presidency to continue will be less destructive to America in the long run than dealing with the civil unrest that might ensue should the truth of Obama’s ineligibility be fully exposed and properly dealt with now?  Soon we will not have an America to contend for.

Do not defame our American military heroes! Do not desecrate the graves of the men and women who have paid the ultimate sacrifice over the past 233 years to acquire and preserve American liberty!  Do not trample the graves of our fallen heroes at Pearl Harbor, Normandy, Arlington National Cemetery, Gettysburg, and the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. Do not mock the men who sacrificed everything by signing their names to the Declaration of Independence.  Now is not the time to shrink from duty, costly though it might be. This tyranny is precisely the reason we have come to this hour!

How can we, in good conscience, embrace our children and grandchildren, tell them we love them, coddle them on our knees, save for their futures, tell them America is great, reassure them of a bright future, and still look them in the eye while we allow this despot, a complicit sell-out US legislature, and their subversive enablers in the national media, to utterly destroy America and its future?  If we are not willing to sacrifice at least as much as our forebears did to secure American liberty, then we too are desecrating their tombs and deserve to have our own trampled!

Will it again become necessary
for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them?”  Will average American Patriots once again be bound to take matters into our own hands because our elected representatives are gutless cowards who have abdicated their sworn duty to uphold the Constitution of the United States?!  Stop being wimps and act like men!

William Wallace of Scotland’s speech before the battle of Sterling is instructive to anyone who might be tempted to retreat or capitulate in the face of this formidable tyranny:

Wallace: Sons of Scotland, I am William Wallace.

Short Soldier: William Wallace is seven feet tall!

Wallace: Yes, I've heard. Kills men by the hundreds, and if he were here he'd consume the English with fireballs from his eyes and bolts of lightning from his arse. I AM William Wallace. And I see a whole army of my countrymen here in defiance of tyranny. You have come to fight as free men, and free men you are. What would you do without freedom? Will you fight?

Tall Soldier: Fight against that? No, we will run, and we will live!

Wallace: Aye, fight and you may die, run and you'll live. At least a while. And dying in your beds many years from now, would you be willing to trade all the days from this day to that for one chance, just one chance to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives, but they'll never take our freedom!

All:Alba gu bra! (Scotland forever!)


America
forever!  Nobless oblige! Nobless oblige!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barak and His Comrades

Barak looked like an old homeboy next to the Little Venezuelan Eggplant.  It was obvious he felt a little exposed tradin’ pleasantries with Chavez and cameras in the room. Do you realize how rare it is to catch two despots smiling in the same frame? That kind of scene usually requires Photoshop, but Barak did it! He did it! We’re talkin’ change, bro, change we can believe in.

Neither despot could hide his giddiness; they connected—big time. When O walked in the room, Little Big Mouth lit up! It was comrades at first sight.  Chavez sees in Obama an up-and-comer he can mentor like Castro mentored him. O's the little brother Chavez never had and Chavez's the big brother O's always wanted.  Welcome to the family, little bro!

Now that O's joined the gang, Venezuela’s Little Commie Who Could and Cuba’s Chewbacca can hardly believe their own press. They recognized O's despotic savantism right away and they’re elated; tickled red. The goal they’ve tried and failed to achieve for decades has just fallen into their laps! The two dictators are punch-drunk about having a despot in the White House. Chavez and Castro exchanged jabs and placed bets on how long it would take O to destroy American free enterprise.  By the looks of things, not very long. Evidentally, O is a quick understudy.

I just can’t wait to see what happens when O and Castro embrace.  Better yet, when O, Castro and Chavez do a group hug. I bet there’ll be “fireworks.”  I’ve always said, “There’s nothing like comrades, Coronas and Havanas together in a pub overlooking El Malecón. Maybe O and his peeps can meet over May Day and enjoy the festivities together. Heck, O should fabricate a diplomatic crisis in Honduras and use it as an excuse to hang with his homies through the US Independence Day holiday. Better yet, maybe he should stay for good. You feelin’ me bro?!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

US Healthcare: An Open Letter to the Democratic Apparatchik

Dear Senators, Congressmen and President,

This is a lengthy letter, but I encourage you (not just staff members) to read it in its entirety. At least 50% of Americans agree with the sentiments expressed herein, so you need to hear what I have to say.

Fortunately for law-abiding citizens, dumb criminals eventually end up in jail. But I am concerned about another more dangerous “super criminal” that is destroying our beloved nation right under our noses! I refer to them as "smart criminals." These high-IQ outlaws don't dabble in petty theft. They always go for the BIG heist. These banditos are some of the smartest desperados ever to brandish—well, a vote, a filibuster or a veto.

Once seated, smart criminals waste no time. With the drive of a crack addict in search of a fix, smart criminals will trample any liberty that gets between them and power. They rush to enact laws that ‘legitimize’ pickpocketing the American people and embezzle their constituents legislatively. No longer is organized crime at war with Government; they are bedfellows!

For the time being, a bunch of these power junkies have managed to gain majorities in the highest political assemblies in this Land as well as the White House. As Americans have observed at an alarming pace since the '08 presidential election, smart criminals and political power make a combustible mixture. To those of us who pay more than lip service to the Founders dream, these faux patriots are using the US Constitution as kindling for their national version of "Bonfire of the Vanities" and our liberties are going up in smoke. Next up for the pyre? The best healthcare system in the world.

The Democratic Socialist Party (DSP) has mastered its mendacious craft. Liberal Democrats mislead the American people continually and some Republican politicians have dissembled with them. The DSP has become a brood of vipers and the “light that is in you is darkness.” The DSP apparatchik uses “Sleight of Pseudonym” to conceal the true nature of their nefarious legislative initiatives. Democratic Socialists give euphemistic names to legislation in order to hustle the American people. In round one of their gang-rape of America, self-titled 'Progressives' slipped the “National Economic Suicide Act” by an unwary electorate by naming it the “American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.” One round wasn't enough to satisfy their lust, so the DSP and a few Republican deserters continue to "*!#$%^" the American people.  For their next major legislative caper, smart criminals only needed to remove the first two words from the "End of Affordable Health Choices Act."  I'd feel less violated by a thief pointing a gun in my face. At least the guy with the gun is honest!

Perhaps you think my line of reasoning is insulting or out of line. You should be grateful that a natural-born American citizen is willing to tell you the truth. There are a lot of naked emperors running around DC these days so consider my letter a friendly tap on the shoulder.

Now that the current brood of smart criminals has set its sights on the US healthcare system, and realizing that DSP members are always in a hurry to get back to "working for the American people," I have limited myself to one simple question.  I’ve even made it multiple-choice.

Which of the following five major Federal social programs enacted since the dawn of the American Republic in 1776 has 1) been so successful that it justifies seizure of an additional 20% of American GDP by today’s Federal Government; 2) stayed within the bounds of it’s enacting legislation, and 3) not far exceeded its original intent beyond anything it’s originators could have imagined? Place a check mark next to each program that matches each of these criteria.
 
   a   Medicare
   b   Medicaid
   c   Social Security
   d   Welfare
   e   Federal Income Tax
   f   None of the above

Historical background information for each program is provided below to facilitate informed responses.

Medicare and Medicaid:   In 1945, President Harry Truman asked Congress for legislation to establish a national health insurance plan. Contentious debate ensued with forward-thinking opponents warning of “socialized medicine.” By the end of his administration, Truman had abandoned his plan for universal health coverage. Fast-forward 20 years and its déjà vu all over again. In an act reminiscent of “Night of the Living Dead,” Truman is reincarnated as Lyndon B. Johnson and on July 30, 1965, signs Truman's exhumed dream into law as Medicare and Medicaid. Before you throw yourself on the back of the hearse headed to Johnson’s “Great Society,” however, you might want to consider the following facts.

In 1966, 19 million people enrolled in Medicare and 4 million in Medicaid with combined federal outlays in 1967 totaling $4.4 billion. Today, the Truman/Johnson dream has morphed into one BIG nightmare and the Federal Government has night terrors that a sleepwalking American public might awaken to the abysmal state of these programs. Today there are 43 million people enrolled in Medicare, 51 million in Medicaid, and combined federal outlays totaling $514 billion or 21% of the Federal budget! Facing the prospect of already below-cost Medicare payments being further reduced, Doctors are reluctant to participate or are fleeing Federal health insurance programs altogether. Can you blame me for wanting the Federal Government to keep its cotton-pickin’ hands off my healthcare?

Social Security:   In 1935, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act into law. The original Social Security tax rate was 1% for both employers and employees—on the first $3,000 earned. Seventy-four years later, the rate has nearly octupled to 7.65% for both employer and employee—on the first $102,000 earned. Social Security is expected to be unsustainable in a dozen years or so and rumor has it the current batch of criminals wants to do away with the cap altogether! I guess higher-paid Americans still aren't paying their ‘fair share.’ Do I have it about right?

Welfare:   America’s poorest of the poor used to receive aid from private individuals and organizations such as churches, and small state-based programs. In 1935, President Franklin Roosevelt signed Aid to Families with Dependant Children (AFDC) into law. This initial “welfare” bill provided $18 per month for one child and $12 for each additional child. Since its birth in 1935, Aid to Families with Dependant Children (AFDC) has come a long way—baby! Says Michael Tanner in The Poverty of Welfare: Helping Others in Civil Society (August 2003),

Welfare may have started with the best of intentions, but it has clearly failed. It has failed to meet its stated goal of reducing poverty. But its real failure is even more disastrous. Welfare has torn apart the social fabric of our society. Everyone is worse off. The taxpayers must foot the bill for programs that don’t work. The poor are dehumanized, seduced into a system from which it is very hard to escape. Teenage girls give birth to children they will never be able to support. The work ethic has eroded. Crime rates soar. Such is the legacy of welfare.

Tanner ought to know what he's talking about. As a Senior Fellow and Policy Scholar at the Cato Institute, Tanner also leads research into a variety of domestic policies with emphasis on health care reform, social welfare policy, and Social Security. I'll take my chances with Tanner. Why don’t you criminals have a chat with Turner before you destroy healthcare.

The Federal Income Tax:   President Abraham Lincoln signed the Revenue Act of 1862 into law to help fund the American Civil War. No problem there. The Act also established a Commissioner of the Revenue and instituted the Federal income tax as a "temporary measure" that would terminate in "the year eighteen hundred and sixty-six.” No problem there either-serious times demand serious action. The Revenue Act taxed incomes above $600 at a rate of 3% and those over $10,000 at 5%. The Act required employers to withhold taxes from pay and send the money to the Commissioner. When the deadline to terminate Federal income taxes rolled around in "the year eighteen hundred and sixty-six,” total tax revenues had climbed to an all-time high of $310 million and a temporary Federal tax system that beneficent to the Federal Government wasn’t about to be terminated. By 2007, total tax revenues as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) had mushroomed to 28.3%. Compared to the amount of taxes Americans paid under temporary Revenue Act of 1862, today’s Americans quantify their taxes in the number of months out of each year they must work before The Godfather is paid off. Would someone who knows the actual meaning of temporary please speak up?!

"Stupid is as stupid does," so says Forrest Gump's Mama. How many times does a country need to be misled by smart criminals before it learns its lesson? Apparently, at least five. This legislation will push America closer to tyranny and finish off the Founders’ dream. Is this the legacy Democrats want to leave to posterity? Please, I implore you; do not do this to America. Do not do this to future generations of Americans.

William Cook

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Smart Criminals

Fortunately for law-abiding citizens, dumb criminals eventually end up in jail. But these are no ordinary criminals. These banditos are the smartest desperados ever to brandish a filibuster. I call them "smart criminals.  Smart outlaws don't dabble in petty theft. They go for the big heist—political power. Once in power, smart criminals can pickpocket the American people legislatively and embezzle their constituents legally by codifying their crimes before they commit them. No longer is “organized crime” at war with Government; they are bedfellows!
 
With the same recklessness that a crack addict goes after a fix, smart criminals will destroy anything that gets between them and power. For the time being, a bunch of these power junkies have managed to gain a majority in the highest political assemblies in the Land. As we have witnessed at an alarming pace since the 2008 presidential election, smart criminals and political power make a combustive mixture. Unfortunately for true patriots, America's smart criminals are using the US Constitution as kindling for their national version of "Bonfire of the Vanities" and our liberties are going up in smoke. Next up for the pyre? The best healthcare system in the world.

Using the same sleight of pseudonym they always use to obscure the true meaning of nefarious legislation, smart criminals name their bills antonymically to hide their true goals. Referred to as the "Give Your Legislation A Name that Jukes Your Opponents and Constituents Strategy," this antonymic device is taken straight out of "The Smart Criminals Handbook."  It greased the skids for the “Bacon Bill" which was called the "American Recovery and Reinvestment Act." For their next major legislative caper, smart criminals only had to remove the first two words from the beginning of the "End of Affordable Health Choices Act." These guys are slick—really slick.  I'd feel less violated by a thief pointing a gun at my forehead.  At least the guy with the gun is forthright!

To those Americans who are clamoring for Federal takeover of the US healthcare system I have a non-trick question—Which Federal social program successes since 1776 give you "warm fuzzies" about turning an additional 20% of US GDP over to the Feds right now?  At the risk of pushing you outside of your comfort zone, might I suggest an objective review of the Government's track record on other major social programs?  If anyone can prove to me that any two among the following five Federal social programs has been successful, I might even begin to get a few warm fuzzies myself. Ready?  Here they are: 1) Social Security, 2) Welfare, 3) Medicare, 4) Medicaid, and 5) the Federal Income Tax.  In fact, prove just one and I’ll declare you the winner.

Social Security: In 1935, when President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act, the original tax rates were 1% for employers and 1% for employees—on the first $3,000 earned. Since its inception, the Social Security tax rate has nearly octupled to 7.65% for both employer and employee—on the first $102,000 earned. Social Security is expected to be unsustainable in about ten years and rumor has it the Feds want to remove the cap altogether. Well, what do you expect? Someone’s got to secure Social Security before its too late!

Welfare:  The “poorest of the poor” in America used to receive aid from private individuals and organizations such as churches, and small state-based programs. In 1935, President Franklin Roosevelt signed “Aid to Families With Dependant Children (AFDC)” into law. This initial “welfare” bill provided $18 per month for one child and $12 for each additional child. Says Michael Tanner in, the Poverty of Welfare: Helping Others in Civil Society (August 2003),

“… Welfare may have started with the best of intentions, but it has clearly failed. It has failed to meet its stated goal of reducing poverty. But its real failure is even more disastrous. Welfare has torn apart the social fabric of our society. Everyone is worse off. The taxpayers must foot the bill for programs that don’t work. The poor are dehumanized, seduced into a system from which it is very hard to escape. Teenage girls give birth to children they will never be able to support. The work ethic has eroded. Crime rates soar. Such is the legacy of welfare.”

Far be it from me to take anyone's word, but Tanner ought to know what he's talking about. As a Senior Fellow and Policy Scholar at the Cato Institute, Tanner also leads research into a variety of domestic policies with emphasis on health care reform, social welfare policy, and Social Security. I'll take my chances with Tanner rather than those smart criminals.

Medicare and Medicaid:  In 1945, President Harry Truman asked Congress for legislation to establish a national health insurance plan. Contentious debate ensued with forward-thinking opponents warning of “socialized medicine.” By the end of his administration, Truman had abandoned his plan for universal health coverage.  Fast-forward 20 years and in an act that evokes images reminiscent of “Night of the Living Dead,” Truman reappears in the form of President Lyndon B. Johnson and on July 30, 1965, signs Truman's exhumed dream into law as Medicare and Medicaid.  Before you throw yourself on the back of the hearse headed to Johnson’s “Great Society,” however, you might want to consider the facts: In 1966, 19 million people enrolled in Medicare and 4 million in Medicaid with combined federal outlays in 1967 of $4.4 billion. Today, Truman's and Johnson's dream has morphed into One Big Nightmare with 43 million people enrolled in Medicare, 51 million in Medicaid, and combined federal outlays totaling $514 billion, or 21% of the federal budget. Facing the prospect of already below-cost Medicare payments being further reduced, Doctors are reluctant to participate or are abandoning Federal health insurance programs altogether. Can you blame me for wanting to stay with my nightmare scenario?

Federal Income Tax:  President Abraham Lincoln signed the Revenue Act of 1862 into law to help fund the American Civil War. No problem there.  The Act also established a Commissioner of the Revenue and instituted the Federal income tax as a "temporary measure" that would terminate in "the year eighteen hundred and sixty-six.”  No problem there either.  Serious times demand serious action.  I assume dates were spelled out back then.  The Revenue Act taxed income above $600 at a rate of 3% and incomes over $10,000 at 5%.  Employers were required to withhold taxes from pay and send the money to the Commissioner. Tax revenues reached an all-time high in 1866 at $310 million. A temporary Tax Revenue Act that beneficent to the Federal Government wasn’t about to terminate in 1866, or ever.  By 2007, total tax revenues as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) have mushroomed to 28.3%.  Compared to the amount of taxes paid under The Revenue Act that was supposed to end in "the year eighteen hundred and sixty-six," Americans in "the year two-thousand and nine" quantify their taxes in the number of months out of each year they have to work before Uncle Sam is paid off.  Would someone who knows what temporary means please stand up!

"Stupid is as stupid does," or so says Forrest Gump's mom. How many times does a country need to be misled by smart criminals before it learns its lesson? Obviously, more than five.  If we, the American electorate, allow our Government to seize control of our healthcare system, then, in behavior characteristic of the proverbial abused woman, who believing her man’s assurances that “it will never happen again,” goes back for more, we are stupid, and deserve what we get.

© 2009 Squatters Rights Publishing.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Feline Hit Man Headed for the Pound

Michael Vick killed dogs, but Tyler Weinman committed the unthinkable—cat abuse.[1] Investigators have been combing through Weinman’s Internet history and veterinary records of the deceased cats to find out if Weinman’s is just another case of a sadistic adolescent thrill seeker or honor killing by a dog lover over Vick’s crimes against canines. Police also want to know if Weinman acted alone, but the cat’s got Weinman’s tongue.

The teenage kitty killer was released from jail today on $250,000 bond. Weinman will wear an electronic monitoring bracelet and remain under house arrest while he awaits trial on 19 counts of catslaughter. The question that has cat lovers choking on hairballs is “Why, would he stoop to such barbarism when there are humane ways to terminate Tabby?” One bereaved cat owner meowed, “Poor defenseless Tigger,” and fainted. Feline fanatics and police are both worried that there could be copycats.

Cat Coroner Henry Harebawl darted around the crime scene earlier today to assess the carnage. “These cats are in full rigor. I’m finding paws and claws everywhere!” he said. “By the looks of these carcasses, these puddy tats were probably catnapped around midnight and drugged with catnip; toxicology reports will tell us for sure. The toms usually go on the prowl for kitties around midnight. They were probably slain shortly after that; the Cat Examiner’s autopsy reports will pinpoint the times of death.” Harebawl also mentioned that “Cat owners, desperate to save their furniture, are so afraid of furtive feline rescuers that they won't carry kitty into a vet clinic in broad daylight. They end up turning to back alley cat butchers to get rid of their pissing pussycats.”

Callie Calico of Cats Against Cat Abuse (CACA) was on the scene early to make sure investigators didn't overlook anything. "I lost my kitty to a cat abuser," she said." Calico added, "After that traumatic experience, I founded CACA and have given my life to stopping this kind of abuse from happening to other cat lovers. We're working for a cat abuse-free world."

Weinman will be arraigned on July 6 and could get up to 158 human years in prison. That’s about 843 in cat years for the purr sadist. If the prosecutor makes this a hate crime, Weinman's sentence could be longer. The defense is hoping that prosecution will accept the lesser charge of involuntary catslaughter by reason of insanity in exchange for a no contest plea. Lead investigator Bloodhound Bill Bowser (a.k.a. “Snoopy”) dismissed rumors that Weinman could end up in the same prison cell as Michael Vick. “Not on your leash!" Bowser growled. "They’d end up fighting like cats and dogs."

If my satiric take on this story strikes the reader as insensitive or offensive, I've hit my mark. I refuse to raise an eyebrow over the wanton slaughter a few cats in a society that approves the wanton slaughter of 4,000 helpless unborn human beings who are butchered, poisoned, chemically burned, and dismembered in the sanctuary of their mothers' wombs each and every day in this country. Our priorities and indignation are perverse and our damnation is just.

I would only ask that readers be equally indignant over the wanton slaughter every year in America of 1.5 million unborn human beings who are of inestimable value to God who made them, certainly far more valuable than any number of cats. If your contempt for cat abuse exceeds your disdain for child killing, then there is something in you that is as twisted as the neurosis that motivated Tyler Weinman to torture cats.


© 2009 Spin Cipher Publishing.


[1] Actual story can be found on numerous online news websites doing a Google search on “South Florida Cat Killer.”

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Islam Rising in the West - A Prophetic Perspective

Early nineteenth-century Liberalism,1

… stresses the importance of human rationality, individual property rights, natural rights, the protection of civil liberties, constitutional limitations of government, free markets, and individual freedom from restraint as exemplified in the writings of Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, Montesquieu, Voltaire and others … The qualification classical was applied in retrospect to distinguish early nineteenth-century liberalism from the "new liberalism" associated with Thomas Hill Green, Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse, and Franklin D. Roosevelt, which grants a more interventionist role for the state.2

‘Liberal’ and ‘Liberalism’ as they are used today, bear little resemblance to their original meanings.  Today’s Liberalism equates to Statism3 and today’s Liberal is, for all intents and purposes, a Statist. Before they can plunder a society, however, Statists must first "bind the strong man” of truth, for truth is the statist's greatest enemy.  This goal is attained by infecting a society’s time-honored traditional values with pathogenic philosophies such as Multiculturalism, Feminism, Homosexuality, Hedonism, Abortion, and other reprehensible ‘isms.’  For purposes of this article,  I will refer to Statism as a plague—which it is.  The first phase of Statism involves co-opting the host culture’s language, particularly in the area of traditional values, which are a free society's first line of defense against tyranny.  To illustrate, American Statists have hijacked Classical Liberalism’s ‘individual liberty' by shackling it with an “anything goes” meaning that amounts to moral turpitude.4  Thus, Statists have turned America's time-honored value of individual liberty against us in much the same way that an autoimmune disease turns the body's own defenses against itself.

The Apostle Peter spoke of the days we now live in: “While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage.” (2 Peter 2:19) The Psalmist wrote, “But unto the wicked God saith, ‘What hast thou to do to declare my statutes, or that thou shouldest take my covenant in thy mouth? Seeing thou hatest instruction, and casteth my words behind thee.’” (Psalm 50:16-17) Why is this significant?

The West has tossed out God’s Law and a terrifying irony is unfolding as a result—a tyrannical ideology is rushing in to fill the spiritual and moral vacuum in Europe, Canada, and the United States. What is this terrifying irony and what is its prophetic significance?

Muslim populations and thus, Political Islam, are metastasizing indomitably across Europe, Canada and the United States. Muslim birth rates in the west are far outpacing native population birth rates. If these demographic trends continue, the only thing that stands between Eurabia, Canadistan, and Amerabia is time, and not much of it.

The terrifying irony is this: As Political Islam (a redundancy) ascends to prominence, the Law of the one and only God who is love, will gradually be replaced by an intolerant, oppressive, imposed Islamic morality that is at war with everything modern Liberals hold dear.

The neo-Liberal values the West has stubbornly refused to abandon will be forced upon it in the form of Sharia.5 Voluntary adherence will be replaced by forced subjugation to Islamic law which rejects Multiculturalism, Feminism, Homosexuality, Abortion and Hedonism and imposes austere penalties for law-breakers, capital punishment among them. Then the West which chose absolute “freedom” over the perfect “Law of Liberty” (James 2:12) will be given absolute tyranny.

As the scenario above plays out, the West will find itself in the horrible predicament described in the first chapter of Proverbs for those who reject God’s wisdom and counsel:

Because I have called, and ye refused; I have stretched out my hand, and no man regarded; But ye have set at nought all my counsel, and would none of my reproof: I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when your fear cometh; When your fear cometh as desolation, and your destruction cometh as a whirlwind; when distress and anguish cometh upon you. Then shall they call upon me, but I will not answer; they shall seek me early, but they shall not find me: For that they hated knowledge, and did not choose the fear of the LORD: They would none of my counsel: they despised all my reproof. Therefore shall they eat of the fruit of their own way, and be filled with their own devices. (Proverbs 1:24-31)

© 2009 Seeds for Good Soil. For reprint permission, send email to:  spincipher@comcast.net.


1 Also known as Classical, Traditional, Laissez-Faire, and Market Liberalism. (Source:  Wikipedia entry titled Liberalism).
2 Ibid.
3 The Ayn Rand Lexicon describes Statism thus:  “the political expression of altruism [which] is collectivism … [statism] holds that man’s life and work belong to the state—to society, to the group, the gang, the race, the nation—and that the state may dispose of him in any way it pleases for the sake of whatever it deems to be its own tribal, collective good.” and “A statist system—whether of a communist, fascist, Nazi, socialist or “welfare” type—is based on the … government’s unlimited power, which means: on the rule of brute force. The differences among statist systems are only a matter of time and degree; the principle is the same.”
4 Vile, shameful, or base character; depravity. A vile or depraved act. (Source: dictionary.com)
5 The body of Islamic religious law. (Source: Wikipedia entry titled Sharia)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (6) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Good Ship Lollipop (a.k.a. The Supreme Court)

Good Ship Lollipop is a fitting metaphor for a Supreme Court that will be that much closer to weighing anchor for Candyland, as far as statists are concerned, if Sonia Sotomayer is confirmed by the US Senate. Captain Obama will only need one more oarsman and then he can sound the All aboooaaard! for statist interests. The Court is already listing hard to port. The weight of Sotomayer's activism might sink the whole Country.

Once Lollipop shoves off, the ships' navigator, the US Constitution, will have to walk the plank. Thus, the Supreme Court will be left blindfolded on a rudderless ship. Alito, Roberts, Scalia, and Thomas will be reduced to four dissenting voices whose opinions will be stowed in the bilge directly below the poop deck. Initially, America, like the seemed-to-be invincible Titanic, will seem fine, but her fate will have already been sealed.

Don't be fooled! Obama wants Sotomayer on the Court for one primary reason; to leverage her ridiculous views and rulings on immigration so he can fling US borders wide open and ensure amnesty for illegals who, as a voting bloc, favor Democrats. As a card-carrying member of Partido Nacional de La Raza Unida, someone like Sotomayer is the right choice for Obama's agenda. This fits O's strategy to circumvent any legislative impediment, federal or state, to amnesty. If he can stack the numbers, he will ensure his reelection, regardless of how many Americans join Tea Parties.

Note:  Do you like the southwestern United States?  We are losing it. For a chilling reason why we need to be engaged on US immigration policy, watch this YouTube video on the Nation of Atzlan

So why does the Supreme Court accept cases at all?  In reality, a judicial ruling by fiat doesn't really need a legal case, does it?  Why doesn't the Supreme Court just cut to the chase, choose 6-12 social issues they feel need fixing, and render opinions on them? Why wait for a case?  Cases are a formality in a kangaroo court.  Besides, we need 'hope and change' now!

Forget the Constitution; I'd settle for a tiny bit of common sense! How did we manage to put a bunch of community activists with absolutely no common sense, on the highest court in the land?! It is embarrassing.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »